ZitatThe first conflict between Red Bull and Ferrari in 2013 The Racing NerdJanuary 11, 2013 Translated by Nicole By Leo Turrini
January 8, 2013 I interrupt by commenting in the style of Nostradamus on the first outbreak between Red Bull and Ferrari in 2013. Helmut Marko is a guy who doesn’t like to leave things halfway. He wrote in Red Bull’s official journal about the characteristics of drivers (including Ferrari) and he dropped a serie of bomb vessels (but in order to avoid doubt, sometimes the truth sends a bad smell). In summary. 1) Alonso is too much involved in politics (not in an Italian or Spanish election). 2) Alonso spends too much time on the internet. 3) When Alonso said in late summer ‘my real rival is Hamilton’ and ‘I struggle against Newey’, Red Bull decided to ignore it. 4) Marko says, that if Alonso is right when insisting that all the merits are due to Newey, then they should always win the double championships which in 2012 did not appear to happen. 5) Vettel, unlike Alonso, does not read newspapers, he never goes on the Internet (shit, then he also doesn’t read this Blog!?) and is perhaps at the end of the season the most complete and competitive driver. 6) Enzo Ferrari would have congratulated the victory and he would have pushed Alonso to battle. 7) Where are they all now, after Abu Dhabi and Brazil, those who said that Vettel can not overtake? 8) Jackie Stewart broke the pattern by saying that nobody can come and say that Vettel has to prove how big he is by winning without Red Bull. 9) Alonso, who is always on the Internet, replied: ‘I am flattered to know that Red Bull still consider me the enemy number one without even having seen the new Ferrari car’. 10) I have officially opened an investigation. Did Helmut Marko consult our friends Robben or Mazgiorg before exposing his fascinating theories? http://blog.quotidiano.net/turrini/2013 … i-ferrari/
Whatever thank you very much for the article! " title="ty" /> " title="hug" /> Many thanks to Nicole! " title="ty" /> " title="hug" /> Iti s always nice to read Turrini stuff! t" title="hat" />
I will say what the reasons would be likely be for Lotus not succeeding in 2013.
Aaaarggghhh!
For those who still have not understood properly how this prophetic play goes, please note that the reasons in favor of the Black Spot are pure vodka in the tank.
But let’s start with the elements ‘against’.
1) It was known already in the second half of the 2012 season that Lotus is lacking the money. In fact the development plan of the car was essentially stalled and it was only due to the greatness (yes, greatness) of Kimi himself that allowed them to end the season in third place, with a huge victory in Abu Dhabi. So to speak. He even fan aground the Ferrari who was like a red whale. But it was not a question of money.
2) I said the Victory in Abu Dhabi. Ah, yes: arithmetically it cost Alonso’s title, eh eh eh, uh uh uh.
3) Now, if Lotus wasn’t swimming in gold in autumn 2012, why should they be in a better situation in 2013? It ‘s true that they have trumpeted names of new huge sponsors, but I have some doubts about it all (apart from the fact, between parentheses, that I want to see Raikkonen making a commercial pro Coca Cola, eh, even I want to see that).
4) Kimi has already given up. What he wanted he received in 2012. That means that his return could not be compared to Schumi’s return (and never mind the flaws of the Mercedes, I’m talking in terms bare and raw results). He was super motivated, he was strong. I do not know how much boost he can find for the new season in a car that would hardly allow him to fight for the WDC.
5) Among other things, I am convinced that the blond betted on Lotus for one year only, thinking that with the results in his hand he would find a seat in a top team. Instead Red Bull kept Webber, Ferrari does not miss him (although we missed a bit, trust me) and McLaren focused on the bizarre Perez.
6) And who trusts Grosjean?
7) Grosjean is a talent, this is not disputed. But he presented such a sequence of chapels as if he would have some sort of a monstrous psychological complex. Will the same that happened last year happen now also? How does he react to a banal accident at the start?
8) However and regardless, for obvious reasons that I have shown too many times, above all I am a supporter of Kimi, ergo, not only is he like the God of racing, he also appeals to Santa Claus who is known of living in Finland. Santa Claus brought gifts like Abu Dhabi…
ZitatQuote: This is why Alonso does not go to Jerez ...
I wanted to write why I believe in the blond-show, in Huckleberry Hound style, in 2013. But I am overwhelmed with reports on the absence of Alonso in the season's first test, meaning Jerez de la Frontera.
To be honest I think Fernandel has at least ten good reasons to abandon the boring parade on the ruins of the Iberian circuit.
Here is the list.
1) Have you looked at Dasha good?
2) Alonso doesn't trust Massa at all, despite his ritual proclamations of love. So he lays it all on De la Rosa, who as we all know is unbeatable when it comes to sending confidential e-mails. Can you imagine the pleasure of reading Pedro's e-mails after six years?
3) ("Pirelli Zero") Bisignani should make his official debut in Jerez. It's the first week of the WC-era, ie Without Cola. Alonso is keen to show his solidarity to him.
4) What the hell is the point of going to Jerez if you find your car is one second behind the fastest car?
5) The Italian election campaign is an endless show that can't be missed. What if you jump to Jerez and find out later that Berlusconi signed a new contract with the Italians at Vespa's show? I would be mad.
6) About contracts. In the air there are some mysterious photocopies about what Vettel has already signed for Ferrari. Do we want to talk about it? Hablamos español? Sprichen doich?
7) Why the hell you should go to Jerez if there isn't Räikkönen organizing party evenings "around the fire"?
8) Domenicali said De la Rosa was taken because the simulator is decisive, so Alonso will be in the simulator and De La Rosa will go to break his b*lls on the track.
9) Hamilton invited Alonso to the Caribbean sun for a week, so it's better that Vettel goes to Jerez as he looks green (pale) and maybe the Sun of Andalusia helps him to grow.
10) How is the story about Vettel who brings Horner, who brings Newey? Do you remember Schumi-Brawn-Byrne? Hablamos español? Sprichen doich? ...
It is very interesting that he will not be present. But the million dollar question that we may never find out an answer to is: Was this Fernando's choice? Or Ferrari's? Or a mutual decision?
I'm failing to come up with any good reason why you'd sit your #1 driver from the first test. " title="dunno" />
Zitat von an1thNot to sound repetitive... But... If it was Kimi... ' He is not motivated ' story would've been out on atleast one website
I think you're 100% correct. It's amazing the length the media goes to in order to sell a story. Kimi could say 1,000,000 times how rubbish those comments are. Yet some journalist will find a way to work it into a story in the future. " title="roll" />
I'm sure Ferrari have a reason. I guess we will have to wait and see what exactly the reason is..